Musa Aselderovich Biography

Musa Aselderovich Presenter: Leila Khusyainova. Glad to see you at our radio stations. As I understand it, the book represents the interest of your life: you are engaged in it, talk about it on your subjects, and teach it to love it. If you allow you to start with this question: electronic or printed? Printing, but, if necessary, and electronic, too, such a trend in time. When it comes to my choice, that is, for the soul, then of course the print.

I read the course "The latest Russian literature" at the university. It is not always possible to purchase book options, and then the electronic version helps to get acquainted with the texts. This is the trend of time. A person who travels can simply physically not afford to have even the most favorite books in paper form. For example, my daughter is a lot of reading a person, but since she often travels, moves around the rented apartments, it is difficult to assemble the library, although at home it is quite large.

And the daughter uses Pocketbook. A few years ago I used this format, and I really liked it. But when there is a choice, of course, I prefer a printed book. He spoke about the writers, but I think this is true for reading. To one degree or another, a person of my profession, in principle, cannot spend the day without books, although life sometimes forces. But for example, I can’t remember when it was.

Any answer to it one way or another will have the right to life. This is the phenomenon of the book. I would also include a chronological factor so that the answer is accurate: at different times - different questions, depending on what you are looking for. A student comes to your university at the Department of Russian Literature and says: “Musa Aselderovich, why should I read?

I will watch the movie and I will know the plot. ” What are you? But with students and people, this question arises. I answer differently. The easiest way to say: "I will watch the movie." And this is a disease of the 21st century. Why is it bad when first a movie and then the text? Although some believe that this is a kind. First of all, it is bad, because the pleasure of the youth is the “buzz” from their own reading disappears.

Maybe this is the most important thing in literature, when there is nothing imposed between you and the author, not prepared by the director and everything that is in the text you perceive at your level: as you are ready. And most importantly, although it is difficult, you have to include all the receptors: mental and visual, olfactory conditionally speaking. You are trying to imagine the appearance of the hero.

Yes, there is a portrait, but it must be seen. There is such a syndrome: if a person looks, for example, “seventeen moments of spring”, and then decides to re -read Julian Semenov, then he will see the wrong Stirlitz, which was created by Semyonov, but Vyacheslav Tikhonov. This is of course the biggest trouble. On the other hand, when an adaptation of the “idiot” appeared with Evgeny Mironov, literally a surge occurred, and this was confirmed by experts, people began to read.

And if the adaptation pushes a person to reading, then this is wonderful, and this must be welcomed. But still the moment of the pristine discovery is when you yourself open this world, even superficially. Maybe you will see him mistakenly, but he will be yours. The difficulty is that the ability to see the artistic world hidden in the text involves the inclusion of basic abilities: imagination, the ability to reflect, combine disparate parts into one whole.

In films, another person does this for you. This is the so -called clip consciousness. And some believe that the Internet, films, “matrix”, for example, defeated literature. Indeed, a lot has been lost, but this is an inevitable consequence of the time, with which it is necessary to reckon. This volume is just changing. I will give a classic example from Eugene Onegin: "We all studied a little, something and somehow." Sometimes teachers interpret him derogatory in relation to Onegin: the ignoramus of something was picked up there.

But this "non-teaching", meanwhile, was able to speak freely in French, "he knew two verses from" Aeneid ", he knew jokes in the significance of historical facts. There is a certain basic level-code by which educated people recognize each other. In my time, these were separate names: I. Babel, M. Bulgakov, a little later - S. Each generation had its own set of names that had to be known.

Without literature, this image is difficult to withstand, and this is clearly visible from our athletes. I say not condemningly, but somehow it is generally accepted that athletes can afford not to read at all. But they are Olympic champions. But this is a controversial moment. I once heard how Buvaisar Santiev speaks, and it seems to me that he is a person reading.

This is reflected in speech; In how a person is thinking. Some flaunt their "originality"; They say that they do not need it. I don’t know when I studied, we absorbed every word. As a self-taught man, without a systematic education, I always frantically recorded some names, phrases that Samson Naumovich or Lera Ivanovna, my teachers said.

It was a sign for me.I understood: since they say it, then this cannot be known. Or is it an illusion? The fact that they began to read less is a fact. My experience says that the problem is generational in nature, it is a trend of time. It is difficult to judge how natural it is. Such actions cannot be solved by such actions, but, without a doubt, they are needed.

In painting, for example, there is a factor of visual effort that does not require familiarization. He came, saw, and you are already in trend. In the case of literature, this is more difficult. Especially if in volume the book as “War and Peace”. As all children were recognized before teachers, especially girls, although, although they are happy to read “War and Peace”, they miss the scenes of war; And the boys, on the contrary, read these pages.

And now this does not happen. By the way, a fairly large number of people come to our Makhachkala "poetry theater", they listen, read. But, of course, there is a certain snobbery part of society, including among my friends. There was a flash mob on which we read the “Word about Igor’s Regiment” and the heroic songs of Dagestan. I think that collective consider is wonderful.

There was also a wonderful action - “we read the“ war and the world ”, in which I took part and is very proud of it. For the first time I got to the Culture channel, read a fragment of the work. The fact is that almost the whole country, the whole world participated in this, and the text sounded like a national idea. It was wonderful. And this is interesting not only to children, but also to their parents.

What makes them listen? There was no task to persuade these children to read, as they read so. It was about something else: this is a way of immersion in the text, understanding, opening the book. Because “pass”, as they say at school, this is one thing, and read is completely different. In my opinion, reading aloud is in some sense the perfect way now. Paustovsky "Old Cook", "Streams, where trout splashes." First, he focused on those stories where the word draws paintings; where there is no plot or he does not finish.

It was important for me that the text sounded. I opened a lot in a well -known text for myself. Fans know that this effect is in the literature. At the end of the beginning. Ostrogorsky polemically stated in one of his works that the previously read text eliminates the teacher from the need to analyze it. He said this in relation to school, and in a sense - this is an extreme point of view.

Recently I read a book about the school of Marietta Chudakova, our countrywoman, Bulgakoveda.